Three years shows you the shape. Thirty shows you whether it holds.
The free chart already measures what five central banks are doing this week. Pro is for the question that comes next: has this relationship actually held up across cycles, or does it only look convincing on the window you happened to be shown?
A three-year window cannot answer a cycle-length question
Not because three years is a small number, but because almost every interesting claim about liquidity is a claim about what happens across regimes — and three years is usually one regime.
Short windows agree with whoever is holding them
Pick a stretch where liquidity rose and Bitcoin rose, and liquidity looks like the master key. Pick a stretch where liquidity rose and Bitcoin fell, and it looks like noise. Both windows exist inside the same decade. The only way to tell which is the exception is to look at all of it.
The tightening years are the ones that test the claim
Anything looks correlated during a long expansion, because most things were going up. What separates a real relationship from a coincidence is how it behaved when the balance sheets were shrinking — and those periods sit outside a three-year view.
The overlays are what make the line interpretable
Liquidity does not move on its own. It moves because rates moved, or inflation did, or the dollar did. Putting Fed rates, CPI, M2, unemployment and the dollar index on the same axis is the difference between watching a line and understanding why it turned.
A chart you cannot export is a chart you cannot check
If you want to run your own correlation, line it up against your own holdings, or simply keep a record of what the series said before it was revised, you need the numbers rather than a picture of them.
What the $49 actually buys
Six things. The free version keeps everything it already has — this is added on top, not unlocked from behind a blur.
The full history
Roughly thirty years of weekly data instead of three, plus a dedicated ten-year view. Long enough to contain more than one policy regime, which is the entire reason to want it.
Five macro overlays
US unemployment, the dollar index, Fed rates, CPI inflation and M2 money supply, each laid over the same axis as the liquidity line so you can see what moved with what.
The week-by-week table
Every date, the net figure, the gross figure and the weekly change, in a table you can read down rather than squint at. Useful precisely when the chart looks ambiguous.
CSV export
The whole series out to a spreadsheet. Run your own correlation against your own holdings, or keep a record of what the data said on a given date, before anybody revised it.
Chart image and PDF report
The chart as an image and the page as a PDF, both watermarked and dated. For notes, for a record, or for showing someone the thing rather than describing it.
Everything the free version has
The net and gross lines, the US and rest-of-world split, Bitcoin, the S&P 500 and gold, recession bands, rolling correlations, log scale and three currencies. None of it is taken away.
What it still will not do
Pro is more history and more context. It is not a different kind of instrument, and none of the limits below are lifted by paying.
It does not forecast
There is no model, no projection of where liquidity goes next, and no signal. Thirty years of history tells you what happened over thirty years. It does not tell you about next quarter, and nothing on the Pro side pretends otherwise.
It does not make the correlation stronger
A longer window measures the relationship more honestly. Frequently that means showing you it is weaker and less stable than the version you were sold elsewhere. If you are buying this hoping the correlation firms up, it may well do the opposite.
It does not fix the scraped legs
The PBoC and Bank of England figures are read from published tables with a manual override, on both tiers. That is a real weakness in two of the five banks and paying does not change the source.
It does not tell you what to buy
No entry, no exit, no allocation, no threshold. This is background for a plan you already run. If you do not have that plan yet, the free tools and the weekly issue are a far better use of your time than this.
Buy the history, not a subscription.
Paid once. It does not renew, it is not bundled with anything, and it does not expire.
If three years of history already answers your question, it answers it, and you should keep your $49. The free chart is not a demonstration version — it carries the live liquidity line, the regional split, the asset overlays and the correlations. Educational content only — not financial advice. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any asset.